|
This
article gives an overview of the benefits of
neurofeedback. It includes the opinions of skeptical
people from the medical field and also the results
after training from one case study.
Plymouth
Meeting, Pa. -Eight-year-old Patrick Steenson
was working hard to rack up points on his Superman
computer game.
He
used no joystick, no mouse. Only his brain controlled
the computer.
Patrick
was in the midst of a biofeedback session to
train his brain to produce more fast brain waves
and fewer slow ones. He had been diagnosed with
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, or
ADHD, a common neurological disorder that makes
it hard for children to sit still, concentrate
and learn. A tiny electrode attached to his
head was monitoring his brain's electrical activity
and converting that information into the computer
program.
When
Patrick's mind was alert and his body calm,
Superman flew high and steady, a bell rang and
points piled up. When Patrick became restless
and lost concentration, Superman dipped, the
bells stopped, a red light flashed, and he scored
no points.
The
hope was that by the time Patrick completed
40 sessions, he would be better able to pay
attention and stay on task.
"What
we see with kids with ADD (Attention Deficit
Disorder) and ADHD is that their brains are
under-aroused. The brain is producing too much
slow-wave activity," said Domenic Greco, who
holds a doctorate in clinical psychology. Patrick
was getting his biofeedback sessions at NeuroDynamix,
a Philadelphia-area company where Greco is clinical
director.
Through
a system of "practice and feedback," Greco said,
people with attention problems can learn to
produce more of the fast waves associated with
being calm, alert and focused.
While
such neurofeedback, or EEG biofeedback, has
been around for more than a decade, it is attracting
more interest lately as parents look for alternative
ways to treat their children with attention
problems - a trend occurring in many fields
of medicine.
Some
parents won't consider giving their children
a drug to treat ADHD. Others want to wean their
children from medication such as Ritalin, which
is considered standard treatment for ADHD, because
it has lost its effectiveness or is causing
side effects.
"We
are not curing someone of ADHD," Greco said.
"We're teaching them self-regulation." The observations
by him and other practitioners are backed up
by some published scientific articles reporting
varying degrees of success with neurofeedback.
But
critics say the method is unproven and that
there have been no carefully controlled studies
done to say whether it has merit. They worry
that parents are turning their backs on proven
treatment and throwing away their money, typically
$3,000 or more for a 40-session program.
It
is estimated that 3% to 5% of school-age children
may be affected by ADHD, and some studies put
the number much higher.
Children
with the condition often can't concentrate in
school, get bad grades and have difficulty getting
along with peers because of their impulsivity.
A recent study found that teens with the disorder
who are not treated with drugs are at risk for
substance abuse.
"My
own assessment of "neurofeedback" is that it
is at best still an experimental treatment,
that the amount of research is very, very limited,"
said Russell Barkley, an expert on ADHD and
director of psychology and professor of psychiatry
and neurology at the University of Massachusetts
Medical Center.
Barkley
and other critics don't dispute that those with
ADHD have differences in their brain-wave patterns.
Practitioners use EEGs (electroencephalography)
to monitor the electrical activity of the brain
and map brain-wave patterns.
People
with ADD tend to produce an abundance of slow
brain waves and show less fast-wave activity.
Slow waves are associated with being day dreamy,
tuned out and distracted. Faster waves are indicative
of being calm, alert, focused and thinking intensely.
"Can you train people to alter their brain waves?
Could you do that? Yes," said Barkley. But the
big question, he said, is "does this ability
to alter their brain waves translate into everyday
life and does it result in the changes in behavior,
social function, learning and intelligence that
proponents say it does?"
Lynda Thompson, a psychologist who runs the
ADD Centre near Toronto, has been offering neurofeedback
for six years. "It's kind of surprising to me
how harsh the critics are about it," she said.
In
an article published last year in Applied Psychophysiology
and Biofeedback, a peer-reviewed professional
journal, Thompson reported on the results of
111 people, most of them children, who went
through 40 sessions of neurofeedback at her
center. She reported that 30% of the children
were taking medications such as Ritalin when
they started the program, but that number had
dropped to 6% by the end of the sessions.
A
comparison of before and after results showed
a decrease in slow wave activity, a drop in
inattentiveness and impulsivity as measured
by an objective test, and a 12-point increase,
on average, in IQ score, she said.
"The
critics will say it could all be a placebo effect,
but when you have effects this large you have
to say something is happening," she said.
Before
Patrick Steenson, who is now a third-grader
at Presentation B.V.M. School in Cheltenham,
began his neurofeedback at NeuroDynamix, he
underwent an evaluation, including questionnaires
of his parents and teacher and an EEG, to confirm
a diagnosis of ADHD.Then he had two one-hour
sessions a week for 20 weeks. Each time, an
electrode on his head monitored his brain-wave
activity.
Patrick's
has had his final session. His mother, Dottie
Steenson, said she can see changes in her son.
NeuroDynamix will follow up with his teacher
to see if she notes any changes.
"All
of a sudden, there are qualities about him we
didn't see before." She said her son has become
clued in to what's going on around him, he's
more conversant and doesn't get as frustrated
when something doesn't go his way.
"There
are subtle, little things, but I can see his
brain is far more engaged in the learning process,"
she said.
Appeared
in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel on Jan. 24,
2000.
|